• Login
    • Register

Tellus RealtyTellus Realty

Tellus Realty

Contact Us Today At
877-413-7325
Office@TellusRE.com

PO Box 1113 Duvall, WA 98019

  • Menu
  • Home
  • Buy
  • Sell
  • Communities
    • Duvall, WA
    • Woodinville, WA
    • Monroe, WA
    • Carnation, WA
  • About
  • Contact

NWMLS market report for May 2013

The Northwest MLS (NWMLS) released, last week, the sale and listing statistics for this past May.  As most folks know, the news is no suprise .

Competition among home buyers “still fierce;” rising interest rates adding to fury
NWMLS, Kirkland, WA, June 5, 2013 – Well-priced homes continue to draw multiple offers and sell at a brisk pace around Western Washington as buyers react to increases in interest rates and asking prices.Northwest Multiple Listing Service reported double-digit gains in several key indicators it tracks for the 21 counties in its service area. Compared to a year ago, the number of new listings climbed 16 percent, pending sales increased about 10 percent, closed sales jumped nearly 22 percent, and prices rose more than 13 percent. Despite gains in listing activity, inventory remains tight.

Here is the full press release: http://www.nwmls.com/discover/index.cfm?SectionGroupsID=1&SectionListsID=1&PageID=6261

Posted in: Home buying, Home selling, Real estate industry, Real estate investing, Residential market reports, Residential real estate Tagged: market report, May 2013, nwmls statistics

NWMLS market report for March 2013

The Northwest MLS (NWMLS) just released (late last week) sale and listing statistics for this past March. The news release definitely matches what is happening for my clients.  Here is an excerpt from the news release…

Prices “spiking” as home buyers compete for scarce inventory
KIRKLAND, Wash. (April 4, 2013)… Northwest MLS figures show year-over-year prices jumped 14.9 percent for the 21 counties in its service area. The median price for last month’s closed sales of single family homes and condominiums (combined) was $258,500, rising from $225,000 for the same month a year ago. Twelve counties reported double-digit gains, led by Ferry (up 70.9 percent), San Juan (up 47.3 percent), and Island (up 36.1 percent).
Prices for single family homes increased 14.3 percent, while the median sales price for condos, which accounted for about 12 percent of sales, surged 19.6 percent. Two-thirds of last month’s condo sales were in King County; prices there leaped 28.6 percent, increasing from $175,000 to $225,000. The price of a single family home that sold in King County jumped from $330,000 to $392,000 (up 18.8 percent).
Brokers reported 5,745 closed sales last month for a 13.9 percent increase from the previous year when they tallied 5,044 completed transactions.

Here is the full press release: http://www.nwmls.com/discover/nwreporter.cfm?SectionListsID=25

Posted in: Home buying, Home selling, Real estate industry, Real estate investing, Residential market reports, Residential real estate Tagged: january 2013, market report, nwmls statistics

DOL Real Estate Commission issues guidelines for internet advertising and social media

Our friends at the Northwest MLS passed along some new guidelines from the Washington State’s Department of Licensing.  These guidelines cover internet advertising, email, and social media.  The full set of guidelines can be found here.

Its important as a consumer that you are familiar with these guidelines. Being familiar with them means you can more easily identify real estate companies that are acting legally and ethically.  If you find a company that doesn’t take the time to be familiar with the laws and guidance of DOL (or doesn’t follow them when they are familiar), you shouldask if yourself if they are willing to follow any of the other rules that protect you.

Here is the main set of guidelines:

Guidelines for on-line disclosure
All Internet related advertising that consumers can view or experience, as a separate unit, (for
example, email messages or Web pages) should require full disclosure. The burden of proof of
such full disclosures falls on the licensee, the firm, and designated broker (licensed entities) when
addressing a consumer complaint. This disclosure does not apply once an agency relationship has
been established with a buyer or seller. Examples of online communications are listed below:

  • The Web
    Whenever a licensed entity owns a website or controls its content, every viewable page
    should include full disclosure. (A “viewable page” is one that may or may not scroll
    beyond the borders of the screen and includes the use of framed pages.) If you give
    permission for a 3rd party to advertise your listings maintain regular and thorough
    oversight to ensure the information is correct. Adhere to copyright laws.
  • Email, Newsgroups, Discussion Lists, Bulletin Boards
    Such formats should include a full disclosure at the beginning or end of each message.
    This would not apply to communications between a licensee and a member of the public
    provided that the member of the public has sent a communication to the licensee and the
    licensee’s initial communication contained the disclosure information required above.
  • Instant Messages
    Full disclosure is not necessary in this format if the licensed entity provided the written
    full disclosure via another format or medium (e.g., e-mail or letter) prior to providing, or
    offering to provide licensable services.
  • Chat
    Full disclosure prior to providing or offering to provide licensable services during the
    chat session or in text visible on the same webpage that contains the chat session.
  • Social Media
    Full disclosure should be prominently displayed and easily understood and be no more
    than one click away from the viewable page. Each real estate firm should have and
    maintain a written policy regarding their licensee’s use of social media.
  • Multimedia Advertising (e.g. Web based, executable e-mail attachments, etc.)
    Full disclosure should be visible as part of the advertising message.
  • Banner Ads
    Should link to a webpage that has full disclosure that is a single click away from the viewable page, unless the banner ad has such full disclosure.

 

Posted in: Real estate industry, Residential real estate Tagged: advertising, consumer protection, DOL, social media

NWMLS market report for January 2013

The Northwest MLS  released sale and listing statistics for this past Janauary, last week.   Their news release confirms what I’ve been seeing hte market.  Prices are moving up and competition is stiff for good homes with good prices (meaning good condition and well priced, at or below the average $/SF).  Here is an excerpt from the news release…

Brokers report brisk sales, but rising frustration for home buyers
KIRKLAND, Wash. (Feb. 5, 2013) – Punxsutawney Phil’s prediction of an early spring is showing up in the latest housing activity report from the Northwest Multiple Listing Service. Its statistics for January showed a 14.4 percent year-over-year increase in pending sales and a 23.6 percent jump in closed sales amid a 31.3 percent decline in inventory.
The MLS reported 4,289 closed sales during January, surpassing the year ago total by 820 transactions. Last month’s completed sales of single family homes and condominiums had a median selling price of $239,300. That’s up 11.3 percent from the year-ago figure of $214,990.
Supply has dwindled to less than two months in some counties close to job centers, spurring bidding wars. Some buyers are even resorting to writing “love letters” to win over sellers in these competitive situations. Brokers also report an increasing number of buyers have little or no interest in making offers on short sales.

I think its important to keep in mind, of course, that not all sub-markets are created equial. While things are tight in some parts of King and Snohomish Counties, and other parts of western Washington. Many counties have 10 months or more supply of homes (so its still a buyer’s market there). Additionally, even within the tight markets, there are plenty of areas where demand is soft. The highest demand is in the more urban areas, with popular school districts, and close to major employers. These are the classic drivers of home demand

Take a look at the basic stats for yourself:

Jan 2013 NWMLS stats

 

 

 

Posted in: Home buying, Home selling, Real estate industry, Real estate investing, Residential market reports, Residential real estate Tagged: january 2013, market report, nwmls statistics

We survived our first audit from DOL

I found out Friday that the Washington State Department of Licensing audits all new real estate brokerages their first year.  I found out because of a phone call from the auditor who was waiting outside my home/office. (Yes, we run the company out of our home. I meet clients at their office, home, at a property they are buying/selling/leasing, or if all else fails, Starbucks.

Unfortunately for the auditor, I was visiting a client and no one is there to meet him.  So, we rescheduled for today.

I’m happy to say things went fine.  I was mostly confident it would.  But, part of our conversation on Friday had me worried.

Signs, signs, everywhere signs….

The Friday conversation was about office signs.  Not the signs our office uses on properties we list… but actually a sign at the office. The city of Duvall says home-based businesses can have no signs. The auditor said the state requires I have a sign. I reviewed the rules and regulations closely when I opend the business and was confident when I responded, “I don’t think so.” (Hey, it would do no good to be too forceful with the auditor… and I am human, I could have missed something.)  I asked him to be sure and point out the regulation when we met today.

In the end, it turns out we are both right. (I will continue to play nice wth the DOL.)  According to the auditor when he came for the appointment today, the regulation for the sign has been removed, but by accident. He said it will be re-instated by end of year.  I’ll be writing the real estate commission to suggest it stay removed.  I don’t want to have to choose between following DOL rules, city rules, or having to change my business model to have a ‘real’ office that does my clients no good.

Business Card
Business Card

Anyway, on to the rest of the audit…

The rest of the audit went smoothly.  The auditor reviewed the paperwork for closed in in-process transactions.  The main focus was making sure that earnest money deposits were handled correctly.  Our policy is to always have buyers deposit earnest money with 3rd party escrow.  So, that makes the audit process much simpler.  No ‘trust account’ to review.  And, happily all the deposits happened on-time and we had all the receipts.

Other items reviewed were:

  • My business cards, which passed muster. Check it out for yourself.
  • Our business and real estate licenses (which you can view from “Client Resources” links on this page). Again, all fine.
  • Transaction summaries – Our auditor was a bit of a geek, like me, so was interested in our use of Office 365 and sharepoint to track this information.
  • Issues we would have to deal with if we had other brokers in the office (all good info for the future)

Areas for improvement – written procedures

Of course, we are not perfect.  The one area where we had shortcomings is in written procedures.  This is something I’ve been working on, but as a sole broker, its been a low priority to write down procedures and policies for me to follow.  But, the auditor pointed out that there are regulations that require some policies and procedures to be written, even though I am the sole practitioner. So, its now on the schedule to get these written up. I’ll take that oppotunity to outline the additional procedures needed for when we bring other brokers on board.

All in all, not a terrible experience.  No audit is pleasant, but this wasn’t as bad as I feared.  Apparently, I get to look forward to repeating the experience about once every 3 years.  I plan on the future visits to go at least as smoothly (signs or no signs).

 

Posted in: Real estate industry, Technology and real estate Tagged: audit, DOL, licensing, procedures

NWMLS News release – September housing statistics around Washington indicate recovery is continuing, strengthening sellers’ positions

Here is the text of the NWMLS news release.  Below that is a link to www.SeattleBubble.com which provides an alternate view of things.  I have my doubts that this summers’ market means a full blown recovery of the real estate market.  But, I do think its a sign that things are better on the residential side of things.  Still I recommend checking the Bubble’s view to balance the overly optimistic MLS view.

September housing statistics around Washington indicate recovery is continuing, strengthening sellers’ positions

KIRKLAND, WA, September 5, 2012 – Pending sales, closed sales and prices all increased in August compared to a year ago, according to the latest figures from Northwest Multiple Listing Service. Those key indicators, coupled with the persistent shortage of inventory, prompted one industry leader to declare the market has flipped.

Brokers reported 8,338 pending sales of single family homes and condominiums last month for a year-over-year increase of 9.3 percent. Fourteen of the 21 counties in the Northwest MLS service area reported double-digit gains in the number of mutually accepted offers.

Last month’s pending transactions nearly equaled the July total of 8,416 sales and marked the fifth consecutive month of at least 8,000 pending sales.

Closed sales, reflecting several months of strong pending sales, reached the highest volume so far in 2012. Brokers tallied 6,612 closings last month, continuing a streak of four months of 6,000-plus completed transactions.

“In housing markets, slow and steady recoveries are good,” said MLS director Frank Wilson, the branch managing broker at John L. Scott’s Poulsbo office. “A market that runs too high or too fast leads to a quick decline in short order,” he commented, adding he expects good momentum to continue into the fall.

The median price on last month’s closed sales rose more than 5.9 percent, to an area-wide figure of $250,000. That’s up from the year-ago median sales price of $236,000 for single family homes and condos combined, but tapered off from the July figure of $254,900. Clark County claimed the largest year-over-year gain at 18.3 percent, followed by Cowlitz (18 percent), Mason (nearly 16 percent), and Kittitas (13.7 percent) counties.

For single family homes only (excluding condos), prices jumped nearly 6.7 percent, from $247,000 to $263,500. Buyers of single family homes in King County paid $378,000 for last month’s sales, an increase of 8 percent from the year-ago median selling price of $350,000.

“The biggest story this year is that the market has flipped,” proclaimed J. Lennox Scott, chairman and CEO of John L. Scott Real Estate. He attributes the shift to a seller’s market in most areas and prices to a combination of factors, including historically low interest rates, lower adjusted prices, the shortage of inventory, an elevated number of investors, and the return of local home buyers.

Northwest MLS directors OB Jacobi and Joe Spencer are similarly encouraged by the latest numbers, mentioning steady momentum, rising consumer confidence, low inventory, a pickup of activity in new construction, and improving prospects for homeowners who are underwater.

Northwest MLS members were hard-pressed to replenish inventory last month. They added 8,379 new listings to inventory — 749 fewer new listings than a year ago, and about the same as the number of pending sales (8,338). Last month’s additions brought the month-end total to 25,506 listings, down more than 28 percent from the year-ago inventory of 36,907 homes and condos.

“Inventory levels are incredibly low, but our hope is that many homeowners who were underwater can now afford to sell because of the continued appreciation of home prices,” remarked OB Jacobi, president of Windermere Real Estate Company. He also noted a pick-up of activity in the new construction housing market, which he expects will add much needed inventory throughout Puget Sound.

Wilson said he expects activity in Kitsap to pick up there once school resumes and after a typical “pause” around Labor Day. Noting increases in pending sales, closed sales and prices, he said “the only number that is down is the steady decrease in inventory. Lower inventory combined with low interest rates are what is going to carry this momentum forward into the fall,” he remarked.

Another MLS director, Joe Spencer, said the low inventory and heightened buyer activity are resulting in an imbalance of supply and demand, but he believes that “bodes well as we move into the fall season, which typically ushers in an increase in buyer activity.”

Buyers and sellers are “clearly more confident,” reported Spencer, the area director for Keller Williams. These consumers “are looking to take advantage of the market rebound in what appears to be a continued slow and sustainable recovery.”

The condo market showed mixed results. Both pending and closed sales increased, but inventory is at about half the levels of a year ago, and prices are essentially flat.

Brokers reported 1,130 pending sales of condos for a 7.5 percent gain from a year ago and a slight uptick from the total for July (1,188).

MLS members reported 889 closed sales of condominiums area-wide for a 16.1 percent year-over-year gain. The median sales price on those sales was $174,000, which is $1,000 less than a year ago (down 0.57 percent). Northwest Multiple Listing Service, owned by its member real estate firms, is the largest full-service MLS in the Northwest. Its membership includes more than 21,000 real estate brokers. The organization, based in Kirkland, Wash., currently serves 21 counties in Washington state.

Statistical Summary by Counties: Market Activity Summary – August 2012

Single Family Homes + Condos

LISTINGS

PENDING SALES

CLOSED SALES

New Listings
Total Active
# Pending Sales
# Closings
Avg. Price
Median Price
King

3,195

6,432

3,298

2,730

$414,308

$340,000

Snohomish

1,185

2,322

1,324

1,057

$274,460

$246,000

Pierce

1,225

3,792

1,334

983

$223,534

$199,950

Kitsap

416

1,573

385

304

$295,875

$246,250

Mason

142

843

96

58

$189,262

$163,500

Skagit

177

946

204

127

$243,742

$210,000

Grays Harbor

144

912

101

53

$130,698

$123,500

Lewis

105

732

86

55

$136,574

$137,500

Cowlitz

114

540

124

90

$167,828

$159,950

Grant

114

605

76

76

$161,488

$155,500

Thurston

399

1,314

391

306

$225,338

$218,000

San Juan

41

453

43

26

$385,029

$325,000

Island

169

942

143

125

$322,621

$250,000

Kittitas

93

527

72

74

$280,027

$195,500

Jefferson

77

565

63

39

$290,381

$242,000

Okanogan

63

458

32

36

$223,484

$155,750

Whatcom

414

1,643

326

262

$270,179

$237,250

Clark

50

225

50

57

$265,341

$210,000

Pacific

41

443

35

35

$109,531

$95,000

Ferry

8

78

5

1

$199,500

$199,500

Clallam

77

471

52

43

$183,332

$163,000

Others

130

690

98

75

$204,201

$190,000

MLS TOTAL

8,379

26,506

8,338

6,612

$315,656

$250,000

4-County Puget Sound Region Pending Sales (SFH + Condo combined) (Totals include King, Snohomish, Pierce & Kitsap counties)

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

2000

3706

4778

5903

5116

5490

5079

4928

5432

4569

4675

4126

3166

2001

4334

5056

5722

5399

5631

5568

5434

5544

4040

4387

4155

3430

2002

4293

4735

5569

5436

6131

5212

5525

6215

5394

5777

4966

4153

2003

4746

5290

6889

6837

7148

7202

7673

7135

6698

6552

4904

4454

2004

4521

6284

8073

7910

7888

8186

7583

7464

6984

6761

6228

5195

2005

5426

6833

8801

8420

8610

8896

8207

8784

7561

7157

6188

4837

2006

5275

6032

8174

7651

8411

8094

7121

7692

6216

6403

5292

4346

2007

4869

6239

7192

6974

7311

6876

6371

5580

4153

4447

3896

2975

2008

3291

4167

4520

4624

4526

4765

4580

4584

4445

3346

2841

2432

2009

3250

3407

4262

5372

5498

5963

5551

5764

5825

5702

3829

3440

2010

4381

5211

6821

7368

4058

4239

4306

4520

4350

4376

3938

3474

2011

4272

4767

6049

5732

5963

5868

5657

5944

5299

5384

4814

4197

2012

4921

6069

7386

7015 7295 6733 6489 6341

Copyright © 2012 Northwest Multiple Listing Service ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This material may not be copied, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without prior permission.

The SeattleBubble.com view

I think SeattleBubble takes too negative of a view (much like the MLS and NAR like to go too positive).  My guess is that they have to, in order be the ‘objective’ voice.  Anyway read their view here.

http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2012/09/06/august-reporting-roundup-market-flip-edition/

And, if you haven’t seen our view before, it’s simple: “Don’t purchase a home because of the ‘market’ but because you want to own a home.”  We are glad to help you with the financial analysis piece of the decision plus help you make the non-financial decision.  In fact, check out our Home Buyer 101 class coming up. We’ve got one scheduled in December and hope to come up with another before then.

 

Posted in: Real estate industry, Residential real estate Tagged: commentary, real estate market

King County – Eastside – August 2012 Commercial Sales Summary

The following eastside commercial property sales were reported/researched by the Commercial Brokers Association and Northwest MLS in August. 

Contact me for details or for a market report for your specific area.

[skype-status skype_id=”Jason.TellusRE” user_name=”Jason Hershey, Designated Broker” button_function=”Text” use_voicemail=”False” use_getskype=”False”]

Property Name Property City Recorded Date Sale Price Building SF Price / SF Year Built Property Type
220 Sydney Ave N North Bend 8/23/2012 $210,000.00 1,350 $155.55 1950 Retail/Office
1611 Market Street Kirkland

8/15/2012

$517,500.00

1,190

$434.87

1924

Office
Starpoint Condominium – Unit C106 Issaquah

8/10/2012

$
575,000.00

2,187

$262.92

2007

Office
Cantrill Hall Bellevue

8/8/2012

$ 840,000.00

2,966

$283.21

1945

Office
Totem Valley Business Center – Building B2 Unit A Kirkland

8/10/2012

$ 868,500.00

5,913

$146.88

1983

Office
Rosies Too and Kennedy Lamp & Shade Bellevue

8/13/2012

$ 1,475,000.00

6,925

$213.00

1958

Retail
CF Truck Terminal – Woodinville Woodinville

8/3/2012

$ 3,200,000.00

9,200

$347.83

1981

Industrial
Marina Park Building Kirkland

8/20/2012

$ 5,650,000.00

32,204

$175.44

1980

Office
Sherwood Shopping Center Bellevue

8/21/2012

$ 18,750,000.00

61,176

$306.49

1970

Retail
City Center Bellevue Bellevue

8/21/2012

$228,765,000.00

695,148

$329.09

1987

Office

Posted in: Commercial real estate, Real estate industry, Real estate investing Tagged: august 2012, commercial real estate, eastside, market report

How to view properties from-out-of-state

Shopping for real estate from a distance can be a real challenge, for both the buyer and the agent. Internet listings don’t always provide an accurate picture of the property.  Some agents manage to make the property look better than the reality. And, sadly enough, some agents manage to make it look worse.

More importantly, the listing agent doesn’t know what features or aspects are important to the buyer.  That is the job of the buyer’s agent.

At Tellus Real Estate we’ve found a few methods to help our out-of-state and international clients get a better feel for a property.  One method is straightforward, take our own pictures… focussing on those features that we know are important to our clients.

Another method is to take a video camera and do a video walkthrough.  Here is an example of a walkthrough we did recently for an out-of-state client:

When doing this kind of walkthrough, we have some rough guidelines that we follow for posting:

  1. We use YouTube, because most folks are familiar with it.
  2. We don’t include info about the property in the video.  This avoids problems with agents and  owners.
  3. We don’t ‘list’ the videos in our youtube feed, for same reason as previous.
  4. When we take still photos, we include them in the video also, for convenience.
  5. We try and work with a local contacts (like a family member or business partner) to have them do an in-person viewing to augment the video.
  6. Make it public so client does not have to sign-in to youtube.  We go back and forth on this, because it would make it much more private if we did require sign in.  But, some clients don’t want to sign in, especially with the Google security concerns as of late.

Posted in: Real estate industry, Real estate investing, Technology and real estate

Pre-auction bids and auction site fun

Thanks to some transactions for some of my investor clients, I’m developing a new expertise… handling transactions on auction sites.

Twice in the past month, we’ve had offers submitted to local agents get ‘redirected’ to an auction site, Auction.com, where we put in “pre-auction bids”. 

In many ways, I think the process is much easier than a traditional offer, but it takes a little getting used to.  More importantly, you really have to prepare the buyers.  Investors tend to be flexible, so we were lucky.  But, a first-time home buyer could easily be confused, frustrated, and stressed out by the process.

One thing to know is that the site charges buyers a 5% premium.  Now wait, its not so bad.  When you put in the offer, you just input the total price you want to pay, and they deduct the premium from your offer. So, if your client wants to pay a total of $100,000, then their actual offer is only $95,000 (actually, $95,238).  At least, the bank that owns the property views it that way.

You put in your offer, and let them know if you will be financing the property (you can use your own lender, but check the restrictions listed on the site).  If your offer falls within a range acceptable by the bank (I’ve been told that within 10% of asking should work) then someone from the auction site will contact you back the next day and ask for verification of earnest money availability (copy of a cashiers check is all that is needed), or if its an all cash offer, proof of funds (bank statement works).

You’ll also be asked about contingencies, and this is where the process becomes something ugly for the average buyer… they are not interested in inspection contingencies or other typical contingencies of a standard offer.  The buyer need to be prepared to do an inspection before even putting in an offer, or live without an inspection later. There is also no title contingency and even financing contingencies are not allowed (though they except offers that depend on financing).

If the offer is accepted, the buyer will need to put down at least 5% as their earnest money deposit, depending on the contract provided by the bank.  oh… didn’t I mention that?  the contract will be one provided by the bank… forget your normal MLS contract… so make sure to tell your buyer to get it reviewed by an attorney. 

Another thing with the contract… their asking for electronic signatures via Docusign.  Double-check with your lenders by the way… they may not accept electronic signatures.

But, I guess I got ahead of myself… getting the contract was the last step and signalled the end of the auction site involvement… some of the negotiation ended up being verbal… anathema to real estate agents… but unavoidable.  The listing agent wasn’t even involved. It happened with an asset manager for the auction company, acting as go-between with the bank.

So, after the offer is accepted and contract signed, the transaction goes into normal mode and you deal primarily with the escrow company at that point.

I suspect this is going to be the future of REO transactions.  Small commissions to local agents to manage the property, but the offer process handled via centralized processors like Auction.com.  Especially for larger property owners like FNMA, HUD, etc.

Good luck to you as a buyer or as an agent if you run into this process in the near future!

For agents, check out this blog post about the positives of online auctions: http://activerain.com/blogsview/805016/online-auctions-for-realtors-the-benefits-are-real

Posted in: Home buying, Real estate industry

Class: Forward Thinking in Reverse – Reverse Mortgages Explained (10/27)

Class Description:

This course is designed for those who are interested in learning more about the reverse mortgage program. Included in the course is a history of reverse mortgages and how they have evolved. The class will concentrate on the HECM (Home Equity Conversion Mortgage) program insured by HUD/FHA. We will answer questions such as; “What is a reverse mortgage and how does it work?” “How does one qualify for a reverse mortgage?”  “What are some common uses?” “What are the costs involved?” “How are funds disbursed?” “How is the borrower protected?” “Can I purchase a home with a reverse mortgage?” “What are the 19 questions anyone interested in a reverse mortgage should know the answers to?” We will also cover common misconceptions and demographic data specific to an aging population.

Class is taught by an experienced/licensed mortgage broker, Jeff Nance of Golf Savings Bank.

Location:
PPMS: Park Place Middle School
1408 West Main Street
Room C-7
October 27, 2009
6:30-8:30 PM

Class schedule and registration info: 
http://www.monroe.wednet.edu/COMMUNITY_SCHOOLS/Fall2009CommunitySchools.pdf

 

Posted in: Home selling, Real estate industry

Posts navigation

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »

About Us

Welcome to Tellus Realty! We’re is committed to helping you make informed and rewarding decisions whether your or looking to buy and sell real estate, or in search of a new home for your license. Tellus Realty provided a more personal, one-on-one experience. We are not affiliated with a big-box or franchise where agents and clients are viewed as a statistic or number. Our team focuses on service and quality.

Our Communities

  • Duvall, WA
  • Woodinville, WA
  • Monroe, WA
  • Carnation, WA

Contact Us

PO Box 1113 Duvall, WA 98019

Office@TellusRE.com
877-413-7325
© 2025 · Equity Framework · DMCA Notice
Privacy Policy · Listings Sitemap · Sitemap